Legal Updates

Digital Assets Series: Chapter 6

A General Comparison between IEO, ECF and P2P Financing in Malaysia

A recognised market is essentially an alternative trading venue, marketplace or facility that brings together purchasers and sellers of capital market products under the purview of the SC. These recognised markets are operated by recognised market operators (“RMO(s)”) who are registered pursuant to Section 34 of the Capital Markets and Services Act 2007 (“CMSA”).

In comparison with approved markets such as the Main Market, ACE Market and LEAP Market of Bursa Malaysia Securities Berhad, which are approved pursuant to Section 8 of the CMSA and subject to stringent requirements under securities laws, the regulations for recognised markets are designed and promulgated to commensurate with the risk profile, nature and scope of the recognised market operations.

Pursuant to the responses received on its Public Consultation Paper No. 2/2014 titled “Proposed Regulatory Framework for Equity Crowdfunding” which sought feedback from the public in respect of the proposed regulatory framework for ECF activities in Malaysia, the SC had on 10 February 2015 issued the Guidelines on Regulation of Markets under Section 34 of CMSA. This was subsequently replaced by the Guidelines on Recognized Markets (“RM Guidelines”) issued on 11 December 2015 which introduced the terms “recognised market” and “RMO(s)”.

Today, save for IEO which is specifically regulated under the Guidelines on Digital Assets (“DA Guidelines”), all recognised markets in Malaysia including a digital asset exchange (“DAX”), ECF and P2P Financing are regulated under the RM Guidelines. An IEO operator which is registered under the DA Guidelines shall, however, be deemed to be registered as a RMO for the purposes of section 34 of the CMSA.

 

This legal update is for general information only and is not a substitute for legal advice.

Published on: 31 May 2021

Digital Assets Series: Chapter 5

A General Comparison between IEO and IPO in Malaysia

In Malaysia, an eligible company which chooses to go public may seek admission of its shares on any of the three approved markets available on the stock exchange of Malaysia, Bursa Malaysia Securities Berhad (“Bursa Securities”), namely:

  • the Main Market, the prime market for established companies which satisfy any of the quantitative admission criteria (as set out under paragraph 2.1 below);
  • the Access, Certainty, Efficiency (“ACE”) Market (formerly known as the MESDAQ Market prior to 3 August 2009), a sponsor-driven market for companies with growth prospects; and
  • the Leading Entrepreneur Accelerator Platform (“LEAP”) Market, an adviser-driven market for emerging companies, including small and medium-sized enterprises (“SMEs”).

Any company intending to list on the Main Market, ACE Market or LEAP Market by undertaking an IPO is required to, in addition to other applicable laws and/or guidelines, comply with the respective listing requirements issued by Bursa Securities for each of the markets (“Listing Requirements”), and the Equity Guidelines issued by the Securities Commission Malaysia (“SC”) (to be complied with by Main Market listing applicants only).

This Article aims to provide a comparison of certain key aspects between IEO and IPO that an issuer may wish to consider when planning for its fundraising exercise in Malaysia.

This legal update is for general information only and is not a substitute for legal advice.

Published on: 25 May 2021

Digital Assets Series: Chapter 4

The Regulatory Framework for Persons Seeking to Raise Funds via IEO in Malaysia

The Guidelines on Digital Assets (“DA Guidelines”) issued by the Securities Commission Malaysia (“SC”) apply to all issuers seeking to raise funds through a digital token offering on an IEO platform.

The DA Guidelines are to be read together with other relevant laws and guidelines including payment services and foreign exchange administration laws administered by Bank Negara Malaysia (“BNM”). To illustrate this, where an issuer intends to issue a digital token which has the features of an existing type of securities such as unit trust funds, bonds, warrants or options, the issuer must also comply with the existing requirements for such issuance as set out in the relevant SC’s guidelines in addition to meeting the requirements under the DA Guidelines.

In Paragraph 2 of this Article, we briefly set out some of the provisions under the DA Guidelines which apply to an issuer, including the requirements that an issuer must satisfy prior to making a digital token offering.

This legal update is for general information only and is not a substitute for legal advice.

Published on: 20 May 2021

Digital Assets Series: Chapter 3

Digital Asset Custodian (“DAC”) and the Regulatory Framework for DACs in Malaysia

Under the Guidelines on Digital Assets (“DA Guidelines”), the obligations of an initial exchange offering (“IEO”) operator in relation to the investors’ digital tokens are to:

  • ensure that the token holders’ digital tokens are properly segregated and safeguarded from conversion or inappropriate use by any person;
  • establish and maintain a sufficiently and verifiably secured storage medium designated to store digital assets from investors; and
  • establish system and controls for maintaining accurate and up-to-date records of client’s digital assets held.

To carry out such obligations, an IEO operator may appoint a DAC registered with the Securities Commission Malaysia (“SC”) to provide custody for the token holders’ digital tokens, or it can choose to provide its own custody services, provided it complies with the requirements set out under Part D of the DA Guidelines. In essence, an IEO operator who wishes to provide custody for the token holders’ digital tokens has to, in addition to being registered as an IEO operator, has to be registered with the SC as a DAC as well.

The DA Guidelines define a DAC as a person who provides services such as safekeeping, storing, holding or maintaining custody of digital assets for the account of another person, and such services constitute capital market services for the purposes of Section 76A of the CMSA. Hence, a prospective DAC must satisfy all the requirements set out in Part D of the DA Guidelines and be registered by the SC.

This legal update is for general information only and is not a substitute for legal advice.

Published on: 12 May 2021

Digital Assets Series: Chapter 2

blockchain, network, business

Initial Exchange Offering (“IEO”) and the Regulatory Framework for IEO Operators in Malaysia

In this Chapter 2 of our Digital Assets Series, we focus our discussion on initial exchange offering and the relevant regulatory framework in Malaysia.

The Securities Commission Malaysia (“SC”) had in its public consultation paper No. 1/2019 titled “Proposed Regulatory Framework for the Issuance of Digital Assets through Initial Coin Offerings” (“Public Consultation Paper”) sought feedback from the public on the formulation of a framework for the issuance of digital assets through initial coin offerings (“ICO(s)”) to mitigate the risks posed by ICOs, for purposes of investor protection and promoting confidence in the ICO market. In the Public Consultation Paper, the SC expressed its intention to adopt an approach similar to the regulatory frameworks of equity crowdfunding (ECF) and peer-to-peer financing (P2P) in Malaysia, wherein the SC shall directly regulate the operator of the platform of an ICO, who in turn shall assess the issuers on its platform.

The SC’s proposals in the Public Consultation Paper were then largely incorporated into the Guidelines on Digital Assets (“DA Guidelines”) issued on 15 January 2020 and subsequently revised on 28 October 2020, to set out, among others, the requirements relating to fundraising activity through digital token offering. Instead of the term “ICO” which was used in the Public Consultation Paper, the term “initial exchange offering (“IEO”)” is adopted in the DA Guidelines and is described thereunder as an offering of digital tokens by an issuer through an electronic platform operated by an IEO operator (“IEO platform”). Where the concept of an ICO involves the offering of a digital asset by the issuer to the public directly, “IEO” is a more appropriate label for the fundraising activity governed under the DA Guidelines as the offering of digital tokens to the public must be made by an issuer through a regulated intermediary, i.e. an IEO platform.

This legal update is for general information only and is not a substitute for legal advice.

Published on: 7 May 2021

Digital Assets Series: Chapter 1

blockchain, block, chain

digital assets: An Emerging Avenue for Investment and Fundraising

Interest in the use of blockchain and in the investment of blockchain-based digital assets has rapidly escalated in recent years, precipitated by the rise of cryptocurrencies (such as Bitcoin and Ethereum) to become one of the most celebrated class of digital assets around the world. Malaysia is no stranger to this phenomenon, as the usage and investment in cryptocurrencies have become popular since Bitcoin’s first bull run in December 2017.

In early April 2021, the total market capitalisation for cryptocurrencies in the world had topped USD2 trillion for the first time.[1] Based on the reports provided by digital asset exchange (“DAX”) operators to Bank Negara Malaysia, Malaysia saw an estimated 450,000 active DAX accounts actively trading in digital assets in 2020. In the same year, transaction values for digital assets trading were approximately RM105 million for the month of August.

Recognising the increasing demand for cryptocurrencies and its untapped potential, most countries have promulgated certain forms of regulations to facilitate and regulate the transactions of these digital assets. Similarly, the Securities Commission Malaysia has taken a phased approach in developing the regulatory framework for digital assets, which will be considered in detail in this and our ensuing Articles.

In this Chapter 1 of our Digital Assets Series, we offer a brief introduction on digital assets and its regulatory framework in Malaysia.

 

[1] https://www.cnbc.com/2021/04/06/cryptocurrency-market-cap-tops-2-trillion-for-the-first-time.html

This legal update is for general information only and is not a substitute for legal advice.

Published on: 4 May 2021

leaves, green, nature

BNM Foreign Exchange Policies Refinement and LOLA Framework Enhancement

1.  Introduction 

1.1  On 30 April 2020, Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM) issued updates and amendments to the Foreign Exchange Policies with a view to improving business efficiency and providing flexibility for corporations to better manage their foreign exchange risk exposures (“BNM Foreign Exchange Policies Refinement”). Two days prior to that, i.e. 28 April 2020, we saw the Securities Commission of Malaysia (“SC“) rolled out certain amendments to the Guidelines on Unlisted Capital Market Products under the Lodge and Launch Framework (LOLA Guidelines) (“LOLA Framework Enhancement”).

1.2  BNM Foreign Exchange Policies Refinement and LOLA Framework Enhancement are certainly initiatives welcomed by the industry, especially local business corporations or foreign business entities investing in Malaysia who face liquidity or funding issues during the Covid-19 pandemic. This article provides a quick overview on the positive impacts of such initiatives by the BNM and the SC.   

2.  BNM Foreign Exchange Policies Refinement

2.1  Certain amendments have been introduced as a result of the BNM Foreign Exchange Policies Refinement, the key ones include:

(a)  Residents are now free to obtain financial guarantee from non-residents for any amount. No approval or registration will be required. Previously, residents can only obtain financial guarantees up to an aggregate limit of RM100 million. With this relaxation, local business entities will be able to obtain greater support from other non-resident entities for their operations in Malaysia.

(b)  On the same vein, residents are now free to issue financial guarantee to non-residents for any amount, subject to certain exceptions, such as, where the financial guarantee is issued to secure:

(i)  foreign currency borrowing obtained by a non-resident special purpose vehicle from a non-related non-resident entity, external borrowing limit under Notice 2 will be applicable; and

(ii) foreign currency borrowing obtained by a non-resident where the repayment of the borrowing will be paid by a resident (other than when the financial guarantee is called upon under an event of default), investment abroad limit under Notice 3 will be applicable.

Previously, residents can only issue financial guarantees up to aggregate limit of RM50 million. This enable Malaysia-based entities to better support their operations in other jurisdictions.

2.2  The refined BNM Foreign Exchange Policies further clarify that a resident is now allowed to borrow in Ringgit in any amount from a non-resident through the issuance of redeemable preference shares or Islamic redeemable preference shares or Ringgit corporate bond or sukuk pursuant to the relevant guidelines issued by the Securities Commission (referring to the LOLA Guidelines), excluding non-tradeable Ringgit corporate bond or sukuk issued to a non-resident entity outside the resident entity’s group or a non-resident financial institution.

3. Overview Of Lola Guidelines In Respect Of Issuance Of Convertible Notes

3.1  Under the Capital Markets & Services Act 2007 (“CMSA”), a person who intends to make available, offer or subscription or purchase unlisted capital market products shall seek authorisation of the SC pursuant to section 212(5) of the CMSA (“SC Authorisation Requirement”) , unless any exemptions under Schedule 5 of the CMSA is applicable.

3.2  Of such exemptions, one that is often relied on by the industry is Part I of Schedule 5, which provides that any issuance or offer made (i) to persons specified in Part I of Schedule 6 or Part I of Schedule 7 of the CMSA; and (ii) in compliance with the requirements of the LOLA Guidelines, shall be exempted from the SC Authorisation Requirement.

3.3  Therefore, previously, for any issuance of unlisted capital market products (including convertible notes) to a venture capital firm or private equity firm (who satisfies the criteria set out under Part I of Schedule 6 or Part I of Schedule 7 of the CMSA) must observe certain requirements under the LOLA Guidelines, the key ones include:

(a)  identification of all responsible parties accountable or responsible in the lifecycle of an unlisted capital market product, which may include without limitation the issuer itself and a person licensed by or registered with the SC (“Responsible Parties”); 

(b)  lodgement concerning the unlisted capital market products must be made by a principal adviser (being a person licensed to carry out the regulated activity of advising on corporate finance and eligible to act as principal adviser pursuant to the Principal Adviser Guidelines); and

(c)  use of Fully Automated System for Issuing/Tendering (FAST) and the Real Time Electronic Transfer of Funds and Securities (RENTAS) system operated by Paynet to facilitate the issuance of the unlisted capital market products on a scripless basis,

(“Relevant LOLA Requirements”).  

 

4. LOLA Framework Enhancement

4.1  The LOLA Framework Enhancement permits any business corporation who issues conventional convertible notes to venture capital firms and private equity corporations registered with the SC under the Guidelines on the Registration of Venture Capital and Private Equity Corporations and Management Corporations (“Specific Registered Persons”) to be exempted from the Relevant LOLA Requirements, subject to certain criteria (“Eligibility Criteria“). 

4.2  Such exemptions see the following benefits come into play:

(a)  identification of Responsible Parties by the issuer of the convertible notes will no longer be required;   

(b)  a business corporate may now conduct the lodgement to the SC by way of e-mail for the launch of its conventional convertible notes without the appointment of a principal adviser; 

(c)  the lodgement fees payable to the SC will no longer be applicable; and

(d)  the issuance of the convertible notes will no longer be subject to the use of FAST and RENTAS system, rendering the fund raising process by the business entities to be more cost and administrative efficient.

4.3  The Eligibility Criteria are as follows:

(a)  the issuance and offering of the conventional convertible notes must solely be made to Specific Registered Persons;

(b)  the convertible notes must not be transferable save and except to Specific Registered Persons;

(c)  the convertible notes must only be convertible into shares of the issuer; and

(d)  the tenure of the convertible notes must not exceed 7 years from the date of issuance, which shall be a date falling within 60 business days from the date of lodgement with the SC.

5. Views

5.1  With the introduction of the BNM Foreign Exchange Policies Refinement, it is now clarified that foreign Specific Registered Persons are able to invest in ringgit denominated unlisted capital market products such as redeemable preference shares and convertible notes in any amount without any limit.

5.2  Further, with the LOLA Framework Enhancement, foreign Specific Registered Persons now have greater options in the types of investment instruments in Malaysia available to them, in addition to the typical investment method in the form of subscription of ringgit denominated redeemable preference shares.

5.3  The BNM Foreign Exchange Policies Refinement and LOLA Framework Enhancement implemented by the BNM and the SC respectively collectively provide greater cost and administrative efficiency for local business entities to seek funding from local and foreign venture capital firms or private equity firms registered with the SC, and are definitely initiatives much applauded by the industry. 

5.4  Please refer to our next article for insights relating to the matters to be considered in choosing between redeemable preference shares and convertible notes as investment / fundraising instrument. 

If you have any queries on the BNM Foreign Exchange Policies Refinement or the LOLA Framework Enhancement, please do not hesitate to contact us

This legal update is for general information only and is not a substitute for legal advice. 

Published on: 12 June 2020

butterfly, common blue, restharrow's blue

Redeemable Preference Shares vs Convertible Notes – Which Works Better For Your Investment or Fundraising?

1.  Introduction

1.1  The Securities Commission of Malaysia enhanced the Guidelines on Unlisted Capital Market Products under the Lodge and Launch Framework (issued on 9 March 2015 and revised on 28 April 2020) (“LOLA Guidelines”) with effect from 28 April 2020. Under such initiative, business entities are now permitted to issue conventional convertible notes to venture capital firms and private equity firms registered with the Securities Commission under the Guidelines of Registration of Venture Capital and Private Equity Corporations and Management Corporation (“Specific Registered Persons”), without compliance of certain requirements set out under the LOLA Guidelines, making such fundraising process more administrative and cost efficient (“LOLA Framework Enhancement”).

1.2  The above remains subject to (i) the Specific Registered Persons satisfying the criteria under Part I of Schedule 6 and/or Part I of Schedule 7 of the Capital Markets Services Act 2007 (the “CMSA”); and (ii) the terms and conditions of the issuance of convertible notes being in compliance with certain prescribed criteria.

1.3  Please refer to our earlier article for further information.

1.4  Following the above, it is expected that venture capital firms and private equity firms will now have the option of investing via subscription of redeemable preference shares (which has been the conventional practice before the LOLA Framework Enhancement) or subscription of convertible notes. Given such development, investee companies or investor should consider which investment instrument can better serve the interest of the respective company or better achieve their commercial objectives.

1.5  Given the emergence of such options to business entities and Specific Registered Persons, this article aims at providing an overview over certain matters that an investee company or a venture capital firm / private equity firm may wish to consider in respect of its fundraising exercise or investments in Malaysia.

2.  Overview of the relevant matters

2.1  Under the LOLA Framework Enhancement, the Securities Commission clarified in the FAQ on the Requirements of the LOLA Guidelines (click here) that currently only conventional convertible notes may be issued under the enhanced LOLA Guidelines, although the Securities Commission acknowledged that this may change subject to a revision to the LOLA Guidelines in the future.

2.2  We set out below a brief overview of the matters which a venture capital firm or private equity firm or investee company wish to consider when deciding between issuance of redeemable preference shares (“RPS”) or convertible notes (“CN”) as investment insturment: 

No.
Subject Matter
Redeemable Preference Shares (RPS)
Convertible Notes (CN)
1. Amendments to the constitution of the issuer to reflect the rights of the RPS holders or CN holders. Required under section 90(4) of the Companies Act 2016.  Not Required
 2. Priority on liquidation and return of capital  

Holders of RPS rank after the creditors of the issuer, whether secured or unsecured. Generally, the investment agreement would provide that the holders of RPS shall have priority over the ordinary shareholders of the issuer on liquidation or return of capital. 

Holders of CN rank pari passu with unsecured creditors of the issuer, and shall have priority over ordinary and preference shareholders of the issuer on liquidation or return of capital.
 3. Conversion to ordinary shares

Convertibility of the RPS into ordinary shares depends on the terms of the issuance. If permitted under the terms, RPS can be convertible into ordinary shares at such term and during such period as may be agreed between the parties. 

Yes, CN are convertible into ordinary shares of the issuer at such term and during such period as may be agreed between the parties. 

 

 4. Redemption / Repayment

Compulsory Redemption

 

Typically, in the event of default or upon occurrence of a prescribed event (if any), the RPS shall be redeemed by the issuer by paying the subscription amount of the outstanding RPS, computed at an agreed rate (together with any declared but unpaid dividend on a cumulative / non-cumulative basis). 

 

Voluntary Redemption

 

If the terms of the issuance permit, the issuer may redeem the RPS at certain agreed rate by delivery of a written notice, subject to there being no event of default.

Please refer to Paragraph 3 of this article concerning capital maintenance rules under the Companies Act 2016 which may impede the flexibility of redemption of RPS.

Compulsory Redemption

 

Typically, in the event of default or upon occurrence of a prescribed event (if any), the CN shall be redeemed by the issuer by paying the subscription amount of the outstanding CN, computed at an agreed rate (together with any accrued and unpaid interest).  

 

Voluntary Redemption

 

If the terms of the issuance permit, the issuer may redeem the CN prior to its maturity at an agreed rate by delivery of a written notice, subject to there being no event of default.

Redemption of CN is not subject to capital maintenance rules.

 

5.  Dividend / Interest

RPS generally carry preferential dividend (cumulative or non-cumulative).

Issuer may only distribute dividends from its profits.

CN generally bears interest at an agreed rate from the date of issuance until conversion of the CN into ordinary shares of the issuer or redemption, whichever is the earlier. 

Payment of interest constitutes a debt to the CN holder, the payment of which is not subject to the issuer having sufficient profits.

 6. Rights to vote in meetings

Generally, RPS holders have no right to vote on a resolution as that of ordinary shares at a general meeting of the issuer.   

 

Notwithstanding, the preference shares may still carry certain voting rights which must be specified in the Constitution of the issuer. The RPS holders may be able to vote on matters relating to their respective class of shares provided that such rights are stated in the Constitution as required under section 90(4) of the Companies Act 2016. 

In addition, it should be noted that further control may be exercised by the RPS holders over the affairs of the issuer by inclusion into the subscription agreement certain protective provisions which may limit the issuer’s ability to carry out certain corporate exercises without the blessing of the RPS holders.

Generally, CN holders have no right to vote on resolution as that of ordinary shares at a general meeting of the issuer.

 

However, the control exercised by the CN holders over the affairs of the issuer may be enshrined in the terms of the issuance, such as inclusion of certain protective provisions that may limit the issuer’s ability to carry out certain corporate exercises without the blessing of the CN holders.

7.  Lodgement with the SC Not required Required
 8. Requirement of a trustee No  Yes, unless exempted under the CMSA
 9. Limit on investment sum pursuant to the BNM Foreign Exchange Administration Rules

No limit to the subscription amount.

 

Pursuant to the refinement of the foreign exchange policies which came into effect on 30 April 2020 (“Refined BNM Foreign Exchange Policies”), the Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM) clarified that a resident entity is allowed to borrow in Ringgit in any amount from a non-resident through issuance of RPS.

No limit to the subscription amount.

 

Pursuant to the Refined BNM  Foreign Exchange Policies, BNM clarified that a resident entity is allowed to borrow in Ringgit in any amount from a non-resident through issuance of unlisted Ringgit-denominated CN. However, this does not apply to issue of non-tradeable Ringgit denominated CN to a non-resident entity outside the issuer’s group or a non-resident financial institution).  

 10. Any concern which may arise from the Moneylenders Act 1950 None None (exempted under Section 2A(2) of the Moneylenders Act pursuant to P.U.(B) 219/2005). 

 

3. Key Matters to Note         

3.1 Malaysia-incorporated companies are subject to capital maintenance rules which aim at protecting the companies’ creditors. Generally, companies are only able to distribute dividends to its shareholders from its profits. Subject to prescribed limitations and adherence to certain procedures under the Companies Act 2016, a company generally may not:

(a)  purchase its own shares or redeem its preference shares;

(b)  reduce its own capital; and

(c)  provide financial assistance to a third party to purchase its shares.

3.2  Although the Companies Act 2016 provides that redemption of preference shares shall not be regarded as reduction of share capital of the company, redemption of RPS can only be effected if they are fully paid up and the redemption is made out of (i) profits (which would otherwise have been available for dividend); (ii) a fresh issue of shares; or (iii) capital of the company.

3.3  Pursuant to section 72(5) of the Companies Act 2016 amended pursuant to the Companies (Amendment) Act 2019, where RPS are redeemed out of profits of the issuer which would otherwise have been available for dividend, there shall be transferred into the share capital accounts of the issuer, a sum equal to the amount of shares redeemed.  Further, in the case of redemption of preference shares out of capital, all directors must make a solvency statement forming an opinion that the company satisfies the solvency test for purposes of such redemption. A company is deemed to satisfy a solvency test if:

(a)  immediately after the redemption the company will be able to pay its debts;

(b)  the asset of the company is more than the liability of the company at the date of redemption; and

(c)  either:

(i)  it is intended to commence the winding up of the company within 12 months after the date of redemption, the company will be able to pay its debts in full within 12 months after the commencement of the winding up; or

(ii)  in any other case, the company will be able to pay its debts as the debts become due during the period of 12 months immediately following the redemption.

3.4  Unlike RPS, payment of interest and redemption of CN by an issuer will not be impeded by the capital maintenance rules aforesaid. Having said that, as issuance of unlisted corporate bonds such as CN requires compliance of the LOLA Guidelines, it may only be commercially viable for the investors to subscribe for CN instead of RPS if the issuance of CN complies with the criteria set out under the enhanced LOLA Guidelines (such that certain procedural requirements and costs may be exempted) and the issuer agrees to effect the relevant lodgement with the Securities Commission. Please see our earlier article for more information.  

4.  Views

The LOLA Guidelines Enhancement is a very much welcomed initiative to the industry, as it has expanded the fundraising and investment options available to the emerging growth companies, venture capital firms and private equity firms. Be that as it may, as discussed in this article, each instrument carries with it different benefits and drawbacks. There is no hard and fast rule to determine which investment instrument better serves the interest of the investee and/or the investor. Before determining a fundraising or investment structure and the instrument to be used, the relevant stakeholders should consider the relevant factors, premised on the financial position, capabilities and commercial goals of the parties involved. 

If you have any questions about fundraising by way of issuance of redeemable preference shares or convertible notes or the LOLA Guidelines in general, please do not hesitate to contact us

This legal update is for general information only and is not a substitute for legal advice. 

Published on: 12 June 2020